Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EWT vs ONEQ: how they differ
EWT and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EWT | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 19.35% | NVIDIA CORP 11.24% |
| MediaTek Inc. 7.56% | APPLE INC 10.04% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 5.64% | MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 4.09% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% |
| ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. 2.86% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| ELITE MATERIAL CO., LTD. 2.75% | BROADCOM INC 4.64% |
| UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2.73% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| United Microelectronics Corporation 2.25% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | MSCI Taiwan | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +84.9% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +67.4 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 85 | 1022 |
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or ONEQ?
- EWT charges 0.59% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EWT and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWT-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources