Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWT vs ILF: how they differ

EWT and ILF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWTOnly in ILF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 19.35%VALE S.A. 8.48%
MediaTek Inc. 7.56%Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.25%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 5.64%Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 7.11%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 4.09%Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.68%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. 2.86%Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 5.19%
ELITE MATERIAL CO., LTD. 2.75%Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 4.83%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2.73%CREDICORP LTD. 4.26%
United Microelectronics Corporation 2.25%Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. 4.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EWT and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
ILF
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI TaiwanLatin America 40
Total return, 1 year+84.9%+33.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+67.4 pts+15.9 pts
Expense ratio0.59%0.47%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings8545

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.

ILF in plain words

ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 55.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or ILF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and ILF returned +33.4%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWT or ILF?
EWT charges 0.59% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so ILF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWT and ILF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 0% of ILF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWT against ILF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against ILF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWT-ILF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources