Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWJ vs SCHG: how they differ

EWJ and SCHG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWJ returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Japan ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWJ and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWJOnly in SCHG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 4.08%NVIDIA Corp 11.02%
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION 3.45%Apple Inc 9.84%
SoftBank Group Corp. 3.37%Microsoft Corp 7.18%
Tokyo Electron Limited 2.90%Amazon.com Inc 5.68%
Hitachi, Ltd. 2.86%Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. 2.58%Broadcom Inc 4.55%
Sony Group Corporation 2.56%Tesla Inc 3.92%
ADVANTEST CORPORATION 2.41%Alphabet Inc 3.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

EWJ and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isMSCI JapanU.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+26.5%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+9.0 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.04%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%95.4%
Holdings179193

EWJ in plain words

EWJ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 179 positions, with the top ten at 28.4%.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +26.5% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWJ or SCHG?
EWJ charges 0.49% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWJ and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWJ and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWJ against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWJ against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWJ-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources