Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or LQD?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +26.5% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWJ or LQD?

EWJ charges 0.49% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWJ vs LQD: how they differ

EWJ is an equity index fund and LQD a bond index fund, and over the year EWJ returned more, +26.5% against −2.7%.

iShares MSCI Japan ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

EWJ and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	MSCI Japan	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	+26.5%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+9.0 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.49%	0.14%
Holdings	179	not filed

EWJ in plain words

EWJ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 179 positions, with the top ten at 28.4%.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or LQD?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +26.5% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWJ or LQD?: EWJ charges 0.49% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWJ against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWJ against LQD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWJ-LQD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources