Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or IEF?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +26.5% and IEF returned −2.7%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWJ or IEF?

EWJ charges 0.49% a year and IEF charges 0.15%, so IEF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWJ vs IEF: how they differ

EWJ and IEF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWJ returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Japan ETF and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWJ and IEF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWJ	Only in IEF
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 4.08%	United States of America 9.71%
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION 3.45%	United States of America 8.94%
SoftBank Group Corp. 3.37%	United States of America 8.91%
Tokyo Electron Limited 2.90%	United States of America 8.89%
Hitachi, Ltd. 2.86%	United States of America 8.87%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. 2.58%	United States of America 8.79%
Sony Group Corporation 2.56%	United States of America 8.69%
ADVANTEST CORPORATION 2.41%	United States of America 8.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

EWJ and IEF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF	IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	MSCI Japan	7-10 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year	+26.5%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+9.0 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.49%	0.15%
Holdings	179	15

EWJ in plain words

EWJ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 179 positions, with the top ten at 28.4%.

IEF in plain words

IEF is a bond fund tracking the 7-10 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 13.3% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or IEF?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +26.5% and IEF returned −2.7%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWJ or IEF?: EWJ charges 0.49% a year and IEF charges 0.15%, so IEF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWJ against IEF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWJ against IEF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWJ-IEF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources