Which returned more over the last year, EMB or VPL?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or VPL?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs VPL: how they differ

EMB and VPL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in VPL
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	SK hynix Inc 4.12%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.80%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	Toyota Motor Corp 1.74%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.69%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	BHP Group Ltd 1.66%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	Hitachi Ltd 1.18%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	Advantest Corp 1.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

EMB and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	VPL Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+36.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+19.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.07%
Holdings	681	2335

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

VPL in plain words

VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or VPL?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or VPL?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against VPL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against VPL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-VPL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources