Which returned more over the last year, EMB or VHT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or VHT?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs VHT: how they differ

EMB and VHT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and VHT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in VHT
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	Eli Lilly & Co 14.07%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	Johnson & Johnson 8.48%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	AbbVie Inc 6.10%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.46%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	Merck & Co Inc 4.67%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 2.93%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	Amgen Inc 2.87%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	Gilead Sciences Inc 2.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EMB and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	VHT Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Health Care
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+4.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.09%
Holdings	681	401

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or VHT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or VHT?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources