Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EMB vs HYG: how they differ
EMB and HYG are both bond index funds, and over the year they finished level, +2.8% against +2.9%.
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.
| EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond | US high yield bonds |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.8% | +2.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.7 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.49% |
| Holdings | 681 | not filed |
EMB in plain words
EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMB or HYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and HYG returned +2.9%, so HYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EMB or HYG?
- EMB charges 0.39% a year and HYG charges 0.49%, so EMB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against HYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-HYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources