Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EFA vs XRT: how they differ
EFA and XRT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EFA returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EFA and XRT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EFA | Only in XRT |
|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. 2.60% | Groupon Inc 1.78% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.47% | RealReal Inc/The 1.75% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.36% | Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73% |
| Novartis AG 1.30% | Warby Parker Inc 1.64% |
| Nestle S.A. 1.21% | Upbound Group Inc 1.59% |
| SHELL PLC 1.20% | Coupang Inc 1.55% |
| Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 1.05% | Maplebear Inc 1.55% |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.98% | Revolve Group Inc 1.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | XRT State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | Developed markets ex US | SPDR S&P Retail |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.2% | −3.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.7 pts | −20.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 22.5% |
| Holdings | 705 | 75 |
EFA in plain words
EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 705 positions, with the top ten at 13.4%.
XRT in plain words
XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EFA or XRT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and XRT returned −3.0%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EFA or XRT?
- EFA charges 0.32% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EFA and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFA and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EFA-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources