Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EFA vs FENI: how they differ

EFA and FENI hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and FENI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and Fidelity Enhanced International ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EFA and FENI hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EFA and FENI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEFAFENI
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC1.47%1.33%
SHELL PLC1.20%1.00%
ASTRAZENECA PLC1.36%0.82%
TOTALENERGIES SE0.86%0.65%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC0.63%1.09%
SAFRAN SA0.53%0.57%
INTESA SANPAOLO SPA0.44%0.95%
BAE SYSTEMS PLC0.39%0.51%
LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC0.37%0.95%
NATIONAL GRID PLC0.41%0.30%
NATWEST GROUP PLC0.30%0.72%
ENGIE SA0.28%0.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EFAOnly in FENI
ASML Holding N.V. 2.60%ASML HOLDING NV 4.11%
Novartis AG 1.30%NESTLE SA 1.77%
Nestle S.A. 1.21%SIEMENS AG 1.63%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 1.05%TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.46%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.98%ABB LTD 1.34%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 0.94%IBERDROLA SA 1.23%
BHP GROUP LIMITED 0.93%BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA S.A 1.22%
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION 0.84%UBS GROUP AG 1.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

EFA and FENI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
FENI
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFidelity
What it isDeveloped markets ex USEnhanced International
Total return, 1 year+18.2%+19.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.7 pts+1.9 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.28%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings705392

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 705 positions, with the top ten at 13.4%.

FENI in plain words

FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or FENI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and FENI returned +19.4%, so FENI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EFA or FENI?
EFA charges 0.32% a year and FENI charges 0.28%, so FENI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EFA and FENI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFA and 0% of FENI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EFA against FENI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against FENI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EFA-FENI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources