Which returned more over the last year, EEM or VUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EEM or VUSB?

EEM charges 0.72% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EEM vs VUSB: how they differ

EEM and VUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EEM	Only in VUSB
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28%	United States Treasury Bill 4.24%
SK hynix Inc. 6.65%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.68%
Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71%	PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 0.59%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.53%
MediaTek Inc. 1.62%	Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.52%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17%	US Bancorp 0.51%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90%	Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.50%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85%	Truist Bank 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EEM and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Emerging markets	Ultra-Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+32.3%	+3.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+14.8 pts	−13.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.72%	0.10%
Holdings	1245	1281

EEM in plain words

EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VUSB in plain words

VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or VUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EEM or VUSB?: EEM charges 0.72% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EEM against VUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against VUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-VUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources