Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EEM vs NOBL: how they differ
EEM and NOBL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EEM and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EEM | Only in NOBL |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28% | Nucor Corp. 1.77% |
| SK hynix Inc. 6.65% | West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71% | International Business Machines Corp. 1.71% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08% | Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68% |
| MediaTek Inc. 1.62% | Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17% | Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90% | Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85% | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | ProShares |
| What it is | Emerging markets | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.3% | +9.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +14.8 pts | −8.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 1245 | 69 |
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EEM or NOBL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or NOBL?
- EEM charges 0.72% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EEM and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources