Which returned more over the last year, EEM or IUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EEM or IUSB?

EEM charges 0.72% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EEM vs IUSB: how they differ

EEM and IUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EEM and IUSB both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	EEM	IUSB
OTP Bank Nyrt.	0.24%	0.00%
Banco de Chile	0.07%	0.00%
State Bank of India	0.15%	0.00%

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EEM	Only in IUSB
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28%	United States of America 0.38%
SK hynix Inc. 6.65%	United States of America 0.37%
Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71%	United States of America 0.37%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08%	United States of America 0.37%
MediaTek Inc. 1.62%	United States of America 0.36%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17%	United States of America 0.36%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90%	United States of America 0.36%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85%	United States of America 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EEM and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Emerging markets	Core Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year	+32.3%	−0.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+14.8 pts	−17.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.72%	0.06%
Holdings	1245	17819

EEM in plain words

EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or IUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EEM or IUSB?: EEM charges 0.72% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EEM against IUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against IUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-IUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources