Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EEM vs FXI: how they differ

EEM and FXI hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and FXI hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EEM and FXI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEEMFXI
Tencent Holdings Limited2.71%7.72%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited2.08%8.66%
XIAOMI CORPORATION0.48%5.41%
MEITUAN0.38%4.79%
BYD COMPANY LIMITED0.34%4.09%
NETEASE, INC.0.33%3.56%
BAIDU, INC.0.29%2.83%
JD.COM, INC.0.27%3.00%
PetroChina Company Limited0.23%2.69%
TRIP.COM GROUP LIMITED0.23%2.69%
China Life Insurance Company Limited0.21%2.30%
Zijin Mining Group Company Limited0.20%2.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EEMOnly in FXI
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28%Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd 0.14%
SK hynix Inc. 6.65%
MediaTek Inc. 1.62%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85%
HDFC BANK LIMITED 0.70%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0.66%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EEM and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isEmerging marketsChina Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year+32.3%−13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+14.8 pts−31.3 pts
Expense ratio0.72%0.73%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings124552

EEM in plain words

EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or FXI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and FXI returned −13.8%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EEM or FXI?
EEM charges 0.72% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so EEM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EEM and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EEM against FXI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against FXI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-FXI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources