Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EEM vs FDVV: how they differ
EEM and FDVV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Fidelity High Dividend ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EEM and FDVV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EEM | Only in FDVV |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28% | NVIDIA CORP 6.86% |
| SK hynix Inc. 6.65% | APPLE INC 5.70% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71% | MICROSOFT CORP 4.50% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08% | BROADCOM INC 3.50% |
| MediaTek Inc. 1.62% | JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17% | ALPHABET INC 2.21% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90% | COCA COLA CO 1.85% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85% | PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Emerging markets | High Dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.3% | +17.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +14.8 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 86.7% |
| Holdings | 1245 | 96 |
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EEM or FDVV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and FDVV returned +17.2%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or FDVV?
- EEM charges 0.72% a year and FDVV charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EEM and FDVV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 87% of FDVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against FDVV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-FDVV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources