Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EEM vs EWT: how they differ

EEM and EWT hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and EWT hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EEM and EWT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEEMEWT
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa14.28%19.35%
MediaTek Inc.1.62%7.56%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC.1.17%5.64%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.0.90%4.09%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.0.50%2.86%
United Microelectronics Corporation0.40%2.25%
ELITE MATERIAL CO., LTD.0.39%2.75%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY CORP.0.35%2.73%
ACCTON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION0.30%2.21%
YAGEO CORPORATION0.30%2.15%
CTBC Financial Holding Co., Ltd.0.25%1.46%
CHROMA ATE INC.0.24%1.52%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EEMOnly in EWT
SK hynix Inc. 6.65%YA HSIN INDUSTRIAL CO LTD 0.00%
Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85%
HDFC BANK LIMITED 0.70%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0.66%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD 0.62%
SK Square Co., Ltd. 0.60%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

EEM and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isEmerging marketsMSCI Taiwan
Total return, 1 year+32.3%+84.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+14.8 pts+67.4 pts
Expense ratio0.72%0.59%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings124585

EEM in plain words

EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or EWT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EEM or EWT?
EEM charges 0.72% a year and EWT charges 0.59%, so EWT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EEM and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EEM against EWT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against EWT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-EWT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources