Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EEM vs EMXC: how they differ
EEM and EMXC hold 73% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EEM and EMXC hold 73% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EEM | EMXC |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa | 14.28% | 17.97% |
| SK hynix Inc. | 6.65% | 8.37% |
| MediaTek Inc. | 1.62% | 2.04% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. | 1.17% | 1.47% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. | 0.90% | 1.13% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 0.85% | 1.07% |
| HDFC BANK LIMITED | 0.70% | 0.88% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | 0.66% | 0.83% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD | 0.62% | 0.78% |
| SK Square Co., Ltd. | 0.60% | 0.75% |
| ICICI BANK LIMITED | 0.55% | 0.69% |
| ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | 0.50% | 0.62% |
| Only in EEM | Only in EMXC |
|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71% | PROLOGIS PROPERTY MEXICO SA DE CV 0.04% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08% | UN. ARAB EMIRATES DIRHAM 0.00% |
| XIAOMI CORPORATION 0.48% | |
| PDD Holdings Inc. 0.47% | |
| MEITUAN 0.38% | |
| BYD COMPANY LIMITED 0.34% | |
| NETEASE, INC. 0.33% | |
| BAIDU, INC. 0.29% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Emerging markets | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.3% | +55.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +14.8 pts | +38.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.25% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1245 | 662 |
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
EMXC in plain words
EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 662 positions, with the top ten at 44.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EEM or EMXC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and EMXC returned +55.5%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or EMXC?
- EEM charges 0.72% a year and EMXC charges 0.25%, so EMXC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EEM and EMXC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 0% of EMXC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 73% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against EMXC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-EMXC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources