Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs XRT: how they differ

DYNF and XRT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and XRT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFXRT
Amazon.com Inc4.42%1.35%
Walmart Inc1.42%1.27%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.46%1.29%
Dollar General Corp0.10%1.42%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.08%1.17%
Kroger Co/The0.02%1.17%
Dollar Tree Inc0.01%1.48%
Carvana Co0.01%1.32%
Burlington Stores Inc0.01%1.31%
Coupang Inc0.00%1.55%
Macy's Inc0.00%1.38%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in XRT
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%Groupon Inc 1.78%
Apple Inc 7.75%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%
Lam Research Corp 2.71%Victoria's Secret & Co 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+20.8%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%22.5%
Holdings18775

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and XRT returned −3.0%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or XRT?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources