Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs XLY: how they differ
DYNF and XLY hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and XLY hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.42% | 22.24% |
| Tesla Inc | 1.74% | 19.66% |
| Booking Holdings Inc | 0.57% | 3.44% |
| McDonald's Corp | 0.32% | 4.16% |
| Home Depot Inc/The | 0.23% | 5.83% |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd | 0.18% | 1.97% |
| General Motors Co | 0.13% | 1.73% |
| Tapestry Inc | 0.01% | 0.74% |
| Las Vegas Sands Corp | 0.01% | 0.34% |
| Yum! Brands Inc | 0.01% | 1.10% |
| Carvana Co | 0.01% | 1.17% |
| Lennar Corp | 0.00% | 0.48% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in XLY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 8.62% | TJX Cos Inc/The 3.93% |
| Apple Inc 7.75% | Lowe's Cos Inc 3.08% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.35% | Starbucks Corp 2.90% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | Marriott International Inc/MD 2.02% |
| Broadcom Inc 3.25% | O'Reilly Automotive Inc 1.90% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.87% | Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc 1.87% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 2.76% | DoorDash Inc 1.74% |
| Lam Research Corp 2.71% | Ross Stores Inc 1.71% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | XLY State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Consumer discretionary |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | −4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −21.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 187 | 47 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
XLY in plain words
XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or XLY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and XLY returned −4.1%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or XLY?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so XLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources