Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs VHT: how they differ

DYNF and VHT hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VHT hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFVHT
Johnson & Johnson1.92%8.48%
Eli Lilly & Co0.89%14.07%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.48%2.93%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.42%2.64%
Boston Scientific Corp0.41%1.14%
Intuitive Surgical Inc0.32%2.39%
AbbVie Inc0.27%6.10%
Pfizer Inc0.24%2.36%
HCA Healthcare Inc0.23%0.96%
Cardinal Health Inc0.20%0.74%
McKesson Corp0.17%1.45%
UnitedHealth Group Inc0.14%5.46%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in VHT
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%Merck & Co Inc 4.67%
Apple Inc 7.75%Amgen Inc 2.87%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%Abbott Laboratories 2.36%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 1.84%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%Danaher Corp 1.84%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%Stryker Corp 1.66%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%Medtronic PLC 1.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DYNF and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%85.6%
Holdings187401

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or VHT?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources