Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs SPMO: how they differ
DYNF and SPMO hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and SPMO hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.62% | 8.46% |
| Broadcom Inc | 3.25% | 7.58% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.87% | 4.81% |
| Lam Research Corp | 2.71% | 3.54% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.10% | 3.81% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 2.76% | 2.02% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 1.93% | 2.78% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 1.92% | 3.85% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.41% | 1.77% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.35% | 10.72% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 1.28% | 2.60% |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 1.21% | 1.43% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in SPMO |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 7.75% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.35% | KLA Corp. 1.39% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% | Coca-Cola Co. (The) 1.21% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | Analog Devices, Inc. 0.81% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.50% | Cummins Inc. 0.51% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38% | Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (The) 0.50% |
| Tesla Inc 1.74% | Quanta Services, Inc. 0.48% |
| Duke Energy Corp 1.63% | General Dynamics Corp. 0.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | S&P 500 Momentum |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.13% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 187 | 99 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or SPMO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or SPMO?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 43% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources