Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs SPHQ: how they differ

DYNF and SPHQ hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and SPHQ hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFSPHQ
Apple Inc7.75%4.51%
Cisco Systems Inc2.76%3.54%
Lam Research Corp2.71%4.10%
Applied Materials Inc1.41%2.80%
Caterpillar Inc1.28%3.78%
Parker-Hannifin Corp1.50%1.08%
GE Vernova Inc0.62%3.15%
General Electric Co0.57%4.16%
Western Digital Corp0.56%2.15%
Newmont Corp0.50%1.22%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.46%4.82%
Electronic Arts Inc0.44%0.45%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in SPHQ
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%Mastercard Inc. 4.32%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%Coca-Cola Co. (The) 3.34%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%KLA Corp. 3.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%Merck & Co., Inc. 2.87%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%QUALCOMM Inc. 2.03%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%TJX Cos., Inc. (The) 1.79%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.50%Eaton Corp. PLC 1.65%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38%Adobe Inc. 1.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DYNF and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveS&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%99.9%
Holdings18799

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or SPHQ?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources