Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs SPHD: how they differ
DYNF and SPHD hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and SPHD hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| Duke Energy Corp | 1.63% | 1.59% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 1.93% | 1.55% |
| AT&T Inc | 1.03% | 2.02% |
| Realty Income Corp | 0.93% | 2.43% |
| Verizon Communications Inc | 0.87% | 3.49% |
| Exelon Corp | 0.24% | 1.59% |
| Pfizer Inc | 0.24% | 2.99% |
| Comcast Corp | 0.14% | 1.60% |
| Huntington Bancshares Inc/OH | 0.02% | 1.33% |
| Eversource Energy | 0.02% | 1.83% |
| Altria Group Inc | 0.00% | 3.45% |
| VICI Properties Inc | 0.00% | 2.68% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in SPHD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 8.62% | Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24% |
| Apple Inc 7.75% | Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.35% | Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% | ONEOK, Inc. 2.66% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | Kimco Realty Corp. 2.46% |
| Broadcom Inc 3.25% | Amcor PLC 2.41% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.87% | Crown Castle Inc. 2.41% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 2.76% | Conagra Brands, Inc. 2.33% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | SPHD Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +8.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −8.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 95.7% |
| Holdings | 187 | 49 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
SPHD in plain words
SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or SPHD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or SPHD?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources