Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs SDY: how they differ

DYNF and SDY hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and SDY hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFSDY
Johnson & Johnson1.92%1.00%
Realty Income Corp0.93%2.14%
Exxon Mobil Corp1.93%0.93%
Verizon Communications Inc0.87%2.15%
Travelers Cos Inc/The1.35%0.69%
NextEra Energy Inc0.63%1.08%
Caterpillar Inc1.28%0.47%
Microsoft Corp5.35%0.36%
McDonald's Corp0.32%0.89%
Medtronic PLC0.29%1.30%
Walmart Inc1.42%0.29%
AbbVie Inc0.27%1.63%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in SDY
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
Apple Inc 7.75%Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%Target Corp 1.55%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%Sysco Corp 1.41%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%WEC Energy Group Inc 1.41%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%Consolidated Edison Inc 1.34%
Lam Research Corp 2.71%PepsiCo Inc 1.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%84.6%
Holdings187155

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and SDY returned +11.0%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or SDY?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources