Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs IYW: how they differ

DYNF and IYW hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and IYW hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFIYW
NVIDIA Corp8.62%16.25%
Apple Inc7.75%13.65%
Microsoft Corp5.35%3.99%
Broadcom Inc3.25%3.78%
Alphabet Inc2.87%7.84%
Meta Platforms Inc2.50%2.81%
Alphabet Inc2.10%6.34%
Lam Research Corp2.71%1.99%
Applied Materials Inc1.41%1.92%
Micron Technology Inc1.35%2.98%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.17%1.86%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.14%3.50%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in IYW
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%KLA CORPORATION 1.41%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 1.21%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.18%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38%PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. 0.88%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93%MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. 0.86%
Johnson & Johnson 1.92%ADOBE INC. 0.62%
Tesla Inc 1.74%SYNOPSYS, INC. 0.57%
Duke Energy Corp 1.63%CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. 0.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DYNF and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%95.5%
Holdings187139

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or IYW?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources