Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs IWO: how they differ

DYNF and IWO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and IWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in IWO
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%Moog, Inc. 0.73%
Apple Inc 7.75%BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.68%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%MaxLinear, Inc. 0.67%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%Argan, Inc. 0.66%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%JFrog Ltd. 0.60%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.58%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%ESCO Technologies, Inc. 0.56%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%FirstCash Holdings, Inc. 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveRussell 2000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+17.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−0.5 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%0.0%
Holdings1871133

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

IWO in plain words

IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1133 positions, with the top ten at 6.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or IWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and IWO returned +17.0%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or IWO?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and IWO charges 0.24%, so IWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against IWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against IWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-IWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources