Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs FTEC: how they differ
DYNF and FTEC hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and FTEC hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | FTEC |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.62% | 18.00% |
| Apple Inc | 7.75% | 14.38% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.35% | 9.54% |
| Broadcom Inc | 3.25% | 5.01% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 2.76% | 1.66% |
| Lam Research Corp | 2.71% | 1.49% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.41% | 1.45% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.35% | 2.64% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.17% | 1.40% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.14% | 2.60% |
| Salesforce Inc | 0.86% | 0.77% |
| Amphenol Corp | 0.77% | 0.86% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in FTEC |
|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% | KLA Corp 1.09% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | Analog Devices Inc 0.95% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.87% | QUALCOMM Inc 0.92% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.50% | Arista Networks Inc 0.89% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38% | Marvell Technology Inc 0.75% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.10% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.69% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93% | Accenture PLC 0.53% |
| Johnson & Johnson 1.92% | Adobe Inc 0.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | MSCI Information Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +35.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +18.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 86.2% |
| Holdings | 187 | 282 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or FTEC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and FTEC returned +35.7%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or FTEC?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and FTEC charges 0.08%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 86% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 37% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against FTEC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-FTEC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources