Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DVY vs VPU: how they differ

DVY and VPU hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and DVY returned more over the year.

iShares Select Dividend ETF and Vanguard Utilities Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DVY and VPU hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DVY and VPU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDVYVPU
EDISON INTERNATIONAL1.54%1.78%
DOMINION ENERGY INC1.43%3.78%
EVERSOURCE ENERGY1.38%1.69%
FIRSTENERGY CORP1.19%1.68%
WEC ENERGY GROUP INC1.15%2.39%
EXELON CORP1.13%3.05%
DTE ENERGY COMPANY1.12%1.96%
ALLIANT ENERGY CORP1.05%1.11%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC1.04%4.47%
PPL CORP1.02%1.73%
CMS ENERGY CORP1.01%1.46%
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC0.99%2.60%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DVYOnly in VPU
ALTRIA GROUP INC 2.30%Southern Co/The 6.70%
PFIZER INC 2.22%Duke Energy Corp 6.31%
T. ROWE PRICE GROUP INC 2.03%Constellation Energy Corp 5.86%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 1.85%Vistra Corp 3.59%
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC 1.85%Consolidated Edison Inc 2.52%
ONEOK INC 1.84%PG&E Corp 2.37%
HP INC 1.61%Ameren Corp 1.93%
LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES NV 1.53%Atmos Energy Corp 1.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DVY and VPU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DVY
iShares Select Dividend ETF
VPU
Vanguard Utilities Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isUS dividendUtilities
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+2.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.5 pts−15.4 pts
Expense ratio0.38%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50080.5%90.1%
Holdings10066

DVY in plain words

DVY is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 18.3%.

VPU in plain words

VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DVY or VPU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DVY returned +18.0% and VPU returned +2.1%, so DVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DVY or VPU?
DVY charges 0.38% a year and VPU charges 0.09%, so VPU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DVY and VPU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of DVY and 90% of VPU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DVY against VPU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DVY against VPU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DVY-VPU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources