Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs XLF: how they differ
DGRW and XLF hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and XLF hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| VISA INC | 1.41% | 7.51% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP | 0.99% | 4.91% |
| CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) | 0.95% | 1.99% |
| AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY | 0.89% | 2.38% |
| MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC | 0.66% | 1.06% |
| MASTERCARD INC | 0.59% | 5.47% |
| S&P GLOBAL INC | 0.37% | 1.63% |
| PAYPAL HOLDINGS INC | 0.34% | 0.50% |
| FIFTH THIRD BANCORP | 0.30% | 0.67% |
| HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC | 0.27% | 0.47% |
| APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC | 0.24% | 0.72% |
| RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC | 0.24% | 0.35% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in XLF |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.95% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.75% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57% |
| APPLE INC 3.87% | Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 3.94% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.97% | Wells Fargo & Co 3.34% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% | Morgan Stanley 3.31% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88% | Citigroup Inc 3.15% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81% | Blackrock Inc 1.83% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34% | Progressive Corp/The 1.68% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | XLF State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | Financials |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +7.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 197 | 76 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
XLF in plain words
XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or XLF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and XLF returned +7.6%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or XLF?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources