Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs VYM: how they differ

DGRW and VYM hold 36% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and VYM hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWVYM
BROADCOM INC2.34%8.07%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.34%2.31%
CATERPILLAR INC1.80%1.73%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP1.59%2.73%
ABBVIE INC2.07%1.57%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.44%1.52%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC2.92%1.41%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)1.40%1.45%
CHEVRON CORP1.38%1.51%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE)2.81%1.37%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)2.88%1.28%
ORACLE CORP2.34%1.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in VYM
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 1.08%
APPLE INC 3.87%Philip Morris International Inc 1.08%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Wells Fargo & Co 1.07%
ALPHABET INC 2.32%RTX Corp 0.99%
ALPHABET INC 2.31%Linde PLC 0.98%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.71%PepsiCo Inc 0.91%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.53%Morgan Stanley 0.91%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeVanguard
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%92.2%
Holdings197608

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or VYM?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 36% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources