Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs VHT: how they differ

DGRW and VHT hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and VHT hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWVHT
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC2.92%5.46%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.34%8.48%
ABBVIE INC2.07%6.10%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.53%14.07%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC1.25%2.64%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.18%4.67%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.55%1.01%
STRYKER CORP0.38%1.66%
MCKESSON CORP0.36%1.45%
ZOETIS INC0.16%0.54%
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC0.04%0.61%
RESMED INC0.02%0.44%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in VHT
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 2.93%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Amgen Inc 2.87%
APPLE INC 3.87%Intuitive Surgical Inc 2.39%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Abbott Laboratories 2.36%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%Pfizer Inc 2.36%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 1.84%
BROADCOM INC 2.34%Danaher Corp 1.84%
ORACLE CORP 2.34%CVS Health Corp 1.83%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRW and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeVanguard
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%85.6%
Holdings197401

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or VHT?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources