Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs VBK: how they differ
DGRW and VBK hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VBK returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and VBK hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | VBK |
|---|---|---|
| FLOWSERVE CORP | 0.08% | 0.13% |
| FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC | 0.07% | 0.24% |
| JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC | 0.07% | 0.28% |
| HUBBELL INC | 0.07% | 0.20% |
| PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC | 0.06% | 0.20% |
| A.O. SMITH CORP | 0.06% | 0.20% |
| LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC | 0.06% | 0.51% |
| LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC | 0.05% | 0.10% |
| GRACO INC | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| GENTEX CORP | 0.04% | 0.15% |
| NEWMARKET CORP | 0.04% | 0.17% |
| WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP | 0.03% | 0.11% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in VBK |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.95% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.75% | REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07% |
| APPLE INC 3.87% | Astera Labs Inc 1.05% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.97% | Natera Inc 1.04% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% | Twilio Inc 0.88% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88% | Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81% | Curtiss-Wright Corp 0.79% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34% | FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | Vanguard |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | Small-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +13.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | −3.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 10.2% |
| Holdings | 197 | 545 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
VBK in plain words
VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or VBK?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and VBK returned +13.8%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or VBK?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources