Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs SPMO: how they differ
DGRW and SPMO hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and SPMO hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.95% | 8.46% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 2.34% | 3.85% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.34% | 7.58% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.32% | 3.81% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.31% | 4.81% |
| CATERPILLAR INC | 1.80% | 2.60% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.71% | 1.77% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.59% | 2.78% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.44% | 2.02% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) | 2.88% | 1.21% |
| CORNING INC | 1.23% | 0.95% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP | 0.90% | 3.54% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in SPMO |
|---|---|
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.75% | Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72% |
| APPLE INC 3.87% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.97% | Intel Corp. 2.95% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% | Sandisk Corp. 2.46% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88% |
| ORACLE CORP 2.34% | Western Digital Corp. 1.77% |
| ABBVIE INC 2.07% | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) 1.43% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.59% | RTX Corp. 1.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | Invesco |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | S&P 500 Momentum |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.13% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 197 | 99 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or SPMO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or SPMO?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources