Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs SPHD: how they differ

DGRW and SPHD hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and SPHD hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWSPHD
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP1.59%1.55%
CHEVRON CORP1.38%2.10%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC1.15%3.49%
AT&T INC0.79%2.02%
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP0.30%1.33%
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC0.27%1.33%
EOG RESOURCES INC0.06%1.99%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in SPHD
NVIDIA CORP 7.95%Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.75%Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%
APPLE INC 3.87%Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%Pfizer Inc. 2.99%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%VICI Properties Inc. 2.68%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%ONEOK, Inc. 2.66%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%Kimco Realty Corp. 2.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRW and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeInvesco
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.30%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%95.7%
Holdings19749

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so DGRW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or SPHD?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources