Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs IYW: how they differ

DGRW and IYW hold 36% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and IYW hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWIYW
NVIDIA CORP7.95%16.25%
MICROSOFT CORP5.75%3.99%
APPLE INC3.87%13.65%
META PLATFORMS INC2.97%2.81%
BROADCOM INC2.34%3.78%
ALPHABET INC2.32%6.34%
ALPHABET INC2.31%7.84%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.71%1.92%
ORACLE CORP2.34%1.67%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP1.59%1.32%
ANALOG DEVICES INC0.98%1.21%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC0.98%1.57%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in IYW
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.50%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%INTEL CORPORATION 2.56%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1.86%
ABBVIE INC 2.07%SANDISK CORPORATION 0.96%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.80%WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION 0.91%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.59%PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. 0.88%
MCDONALD'S CORP 1.57%MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. 0.86%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeiShares
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%95.5%
Holdings197139

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or IYW?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so DGRW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 36% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources