Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRW vs FTEC: how they differ
DGRW and FTEC hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and FTEC hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRW | FTEC |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.95% | 18.00% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.75% | 9.54% |
| APPLE INC | 3.87% | 14.38% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.34% | 5.01% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.71% | 1.45% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.44% | 1.66% |
| ORACLE CORP | 2.34% | 1.22% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.59% | 0.99% |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 0.98% | 1.20% |
| ANALOG DEVICES INC | 0.98% | 0.95% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP | 0.90% | 1.49% |
| QUALCOMM INC | 0.76% | 0.92% |
| Only in DGRW | Only in FTEC |
|---|---|
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.97% | Micron Technology Inc 2.64% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88% | Intel Corp 1.99% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81% | Palantir Technologies Inc 1.40% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34% | Arista Networks Inc 0.89% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.32% | Sandisk Corp/DE 0.80% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.31% | Western Digital Corp 0.76% |
| ABBVIE INC 2.07% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | Fidelity |
| What it is | U.S. Quality Dividend Growth | MSCI Information Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +35.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.1 pts | +18.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 86.2% |
| Holdings | 197 | 282 |
DGRW in plain words
DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or FTEC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and FTEC returned +35.7%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or FTEC?
- DGRW charges 0.28% a year and FTEC charges 0.08%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRW and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 86% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against FTEC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-FTEC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources