Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs VBK: how they differ

DFUS and VBK hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and VBK hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSVBK
EMCOR GROUP, INC.0.06%0.52%
EQT CORPORATION0.06%0.23%
FLEX LTD.0.05%0.42%
CASEY'S GENERAL STORES, INC.0.05%0.83%
TECHNIPFMC PLC0.05%0.74%
INSMED INCORPORATED0.04%0.33%
TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORPORATION0.04%0.36%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.04%1.27%
NATERA, INC.0.04%1.04%
HUBBELL INCORPORATED0.04%0.20%
Astera Labs, Inc0.04%1.05%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION0.04%0.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in VBK
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%RB Global Inc 0.61%
APPLE INC. 5.86%Guardant Health Inc 0.53%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%Sun Communities Inc 0.42%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%UDR Inc 0.37%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%Equity LifeStyle Properties Inc 0.35%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%DraftKings Inc 0.34%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%Cytokinetics Inc 0.33%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%American Healthcare REIT Inc 0.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity MarketSmall-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%10.2%
Holdings2231545

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and VBK returned +13.8%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or VBK?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources