Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs ONEQ: how they differ

DFUS and ONEQ hold 54% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and ONEQ hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and ONEQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSONEQ
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.97%11.24%
APPLE INC.5.86%10.04%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%7.32%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.84%6.37%
ALPHABET INC.3.31%4.85%
BROADCOM INC.2.90%4.64%
ALPHABET INC.2.74%4.48%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%3.03%
TESLA, INC.1.78%3.58%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.0.89%2.38%
WALMART INC.0.87%2.02%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.0.86%1.84%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in ONEQ
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.30%LINDE PLC 0.50%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26%SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.42%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.13%SHOPIFY INC 0.32%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.97%ASML HOLDING NV 0.31%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.83%EQUINIX INC 0.23%
VISA INC. 0.83%MERCADOLIBRE INC 0.19%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED 0.63%NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.17%
CATERPILLAR INC. 0.63%FLEX LTD 0.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DFUS and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalFidelity
What it isU.S. Equity MarketNasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.21%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%87.4%
Holdings22311022

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or ONEQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or ONEQ?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 54% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources