Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs IYW: how they differ

DFUS and IYW hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and IYW hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSIYW
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.97%16.25%
APPLE INC.5.86%13.65%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%3.99%
ALPHABET INC.3.31%7.84%
BROADCOM INC.2.90%3.78%
ALPHABET INC.2.74%6.34%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%2.81%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.0.89%2.98%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.0.86%3.50%
INTEL CORPORATION0.68%2.56%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION0.49%1.99%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.0.47%1.86%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in IYW
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%STRATEGY INC 0.32%
TESLA, INC. 1.78%Elastic N.V. 0.03%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.30%GitLab Inc 0.02%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26%IAC INC. 0.02%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.13%TRUMP MEDIA & TECHNOLOGY GROUP CORP. 0.01%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.97%Figure Technology Solutions Inc 0.01%
WALMART INC. 0.87%CLARIVATE PLC 0.01%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.83%CONCENTRIX CORPORATION 0.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DFUS and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionaliShares
What it isU.S. Equity MarketU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%95.5%
Holdings2231139

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or IYW?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources