Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DFUS vs FTEC: how they differ
DFUS and FTEC hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and FTEC hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DFUS | FTEC |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 6.97% | 18.00% |
| APPLE INC. | 5.86% | 14.38% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 4.52% | 9.54% |
| BROADCOM INC. | 2.90% | 5.01% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 0.89% | 2.64% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 0.86% | 2.60% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 0.68% | 1.99% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 0.54% | 1.66% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | 0.49% | 1.49% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. | 0.47% | 1.40% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 0.47% | 1.45% |
| ORACLE CORPORATION | 0.41% | 1.22% |
| Only in DFUS | Only in FTEC |
|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% |
| ALPHABET INC. 3.31% | Accenture PLC 0.53% |
| ALPHABET INC. 2.74% | NXP Semiconductors NV 0.40% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01% | TE Connectivity PLC 0.34% |
| TESLA, INC. 1.78% | Flex Ltd 0.25% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.30% | Strategy Inc 0.22% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.21% |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.13% | Fabrinet 0.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Dimensional | Fidelity |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Market | MSCI Information Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.5% | +35.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | 0.0 pts | +18.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 86.2% |
| Holdings | 2231 | 282 |
DFUS in plain words
DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or FTEC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and FTEC returned +35.7%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DFUS or FTEC?
- DFUS charges 0.09% a year and FTEC charges 0.08%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DFUS and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 86% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against FTEC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-FTEC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources