Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or XLV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and XLV returned +20.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DBMF or XLV?

DBMF charges 0.85% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DBMF vs XLV: how they differ

DBMF and XLV are both equity index funds, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +20.4%.

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

DBMF and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	XLV State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iMGP	State Street
What it is	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy	Health care
Total return, 1 year	+25.4%	+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+7.9 pts	+2.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.08%
Holdings	not filed	59

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or XLV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and XLV returned +20.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or XLV?: DBMF charges 0.85% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DBMF against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DBMF-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources