Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or VTI?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and VTI returned +17.2%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DBMF or VTI?

DBMF charges 0.85% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DBMF vs VTI: how they differ

DBMF and VTI are both equity index funds, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +17.2%.

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

DBMF and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iMGP	Vanguard
What it is	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy	US total market
Total return, 1 year	+25.4%	+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+7.9 pts	−0.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.03%
Holdings	not filed	3531

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or VTI?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and VTI returned +17.2%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or VTI?: DBMF charges 0.85% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DBMF against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DBMF-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources