Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DBMF vs URTH: how they differ

DBMF and URTH are both equity index funds, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +17.4%.

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

DBMF and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriMGPiShares
What it isiMGP DBi Managed Futures StrategyMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+25.4%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.9 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.85%0.24%
Holdingsnot filed1322

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or URTH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and URTH returned +17.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or URTH?
DBMF charges 0.85% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DBMF against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DBMF-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources