Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or SHV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and SHV returned +3.6%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DBMF or SHV?

DBMF charges 0.85% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DBMF vs SHV: how they differ

DBMF is an equity index fund and SHV a bond index fund, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +3.6%.

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

DBMF and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iMGP	iShares
What it is	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy	0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year	+25.4%	+3.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+7.9 pts	−13.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.15%
Holdings	not filed	13

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or SHV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and SHV returned +3.6%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or SHV?: DBMF charges 0.85% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DBMF against SHV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against SHV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DBMF-SHV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources