Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DBMF vs SGOV: how they differ
DBMF is an equity index fund and SGOV a short-term Treasury fund, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +3.8%.
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF.
| DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iMGP | iShares |
| What it is | iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy | 0-3 month T-bills |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.4% | +3.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +7.9 pts | −13.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.09% |
DBMF in plain words
DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.
SGOV in plain words
SGOV is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or SGOV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and SGOV returned +3.8%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DBMF or SGOV?
- DBMF charges 0.85% a year and SGOV charges 0.09%, so SGOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against SGOV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DBMF-SGOV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources