Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or EWY?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and EWY returned +147.9%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DBMF or EWY?

DBMF charges 0.85% a year and EWY charges 0.59%, so EWY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DBMF vs EWY: how they differ

DBMF and EWY are both equity index funds, and over the year EWY returned more, +147.9% against +25.4%.

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.

DBMF and EWY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iMGP	iShares
What it is	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy	MSCI South Korea
Total return, 1 year	+25.4%	+147.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+7.9 pts	+130.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.59%
Holdings	not filed	82

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

EWY in plain words

EWY is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +147.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 70.0%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or EWY?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and EWY returned +147.9%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or EWY?: DBMF charges 0.85% a year and EWY charges 0.59%, so EWY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DBMF against EWY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against EWY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DBMF-EWY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources