Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or EFA?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and EFA returned +18.2%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DBMF or EFA?

DBMF charges 0.85% a year and EFA charges 0.32%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DBMF vs EFA: how they differ

DBMF and EFA are both equity index funds, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +18.2%.

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.

DBMF and EFA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iMGP	iShares
What it is	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy	Developed markets ex US
Total return, 1 year	+25.4%	+18.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+7.9 pts	+0.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.32%
Holdings	not filed	705

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 705 positions, with the top ten at 13.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or EFA?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and EFA returned +18.2%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or EFA?: DBMF charges 0.85% a year and EFA charges 0.32%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DBMF against EFA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against EFA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DBMF-EFA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources