Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CTA vs SPHD: how they differ
CTA and SPHD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CTA returned more over the year.
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CTA and SPHD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CTA | Only in SPHD |
|---|---|
| SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69% | Verizon Communications Inc. 3.49% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72% | Altria Group, Inc. 3.45% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44% | Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76% | Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75% | Pfizer Inc. 2.99% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20% | Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37% | VICI Properties Inc. 2.68% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07% | ONEOK, Inc. 2.66% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | SPHD Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Simplify | Invesco |
| What it is | Simplify Managed Futures Strategy | S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +8.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | −8.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 95.7% |
| Holdings | 10 | 49 |
CTA in plain words
CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPHD in plain words
SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CTA or SPHD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CTA or SPHD?
- CTA charges 0.75% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so SPHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CTA and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CTA and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources