Which returned more over the last year, CTA or GLDM?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and GLDM returned +19.4%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CTA vs GLDM: how they differ

CTA is an equity index fund and GLDM a commodity fund, and over the year GLDM returned more, +19.4% against +17.0%.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust.

CTA and GLDM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Simplify	iShares
What it is	Simplify Managed Futures Strategy	Gold MiniShares
Total return, 1 year	+17.0%	+19.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.5 pts	+1.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.75%	not published
Holdings	10	not filed

CTA in plain words

CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

GLDM in plain words

GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CTA or GLDM?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and GLDM returned +19.4%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTA against GLDM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against GLDM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-GLDM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources