Which returned more over the last year, CTA or DBMF?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CTA or DBMF?

CTA charges 0.75% a year and DBMF charges 0.85%, so CTA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CTA vs DBMF: how they differ

CTA and DBMF are both equity index funds, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +17.0%.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF.

CTA and DBMF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Simplify	iMGP
What it is	Simplify Managed Futures Strategy	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+17.0%	+25.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.5 pts	+7.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.85%
Holdings	10	not filed

CTA in plain words

CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CTA or DBMF?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CTA or DBMF?: CTA charges 0.75% a year and DBMF charges 0.85%, so CTA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTA against DBMF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against DBMF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-DBMF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources